User:Naksue/Perdicella ornata/Curtnyp Peer Review

General info
Naksue
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Naksue/Perdicella ornata
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Perdicella ornata

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?

Hi, Naksue

Response to peer review:
 * 1) They did really well in presenting a lot of detailed information about its specific species and it’s easy to read.
 * 2) The article has a lot of information about many other sections and not just the description. The article consists of Description, Distribution and Habitat, Population, and Conservation Status. The information is put in the correct sections.  I think it’s really interesting that the author was able to find information about their status, which is a piece of great information to always have for endangered animals.
 * 3) Looking at the sources the author used are good and reliable sources. They provide a lot of information that helped this article. You have sourced each single one of your sentences, so keep it up. The References at the bottom were also put in citation form.
 * 4) I don’t have any suggestions to say about this article because it was thoroughly done with great information and writing. A suggestion could be to not leave out a section with no information because people might get interested in that section and are sad to find no information on it. But I do understand that the author probably didn’t have enough time to write the information down. So I will just leave it in your draft for now until you have time to finish it up.
 * 5) The author did great overall and doesn’t seem to need more improvements aside from adding information to finish up the “Human use and Cultural significance” section, as it doesn’t have any information.
 * 6) I noticed that this article had a lot of information that my article lacked, and I also lacked more sources with more information about my species. I love the Conservation Status section that presents where the article is on the list of endangerment.

Hey Courtney! '''I appreciate you complimenting my work for having excellent writing and information. I hope my draft inspired you to incorporate further details into your work, as you said. I wish you well in your draft.'''