User:Namington4/Calorimeter/Editsfordummies Peer Review

Lead:

The lead section is well organized along with additional topics added in to make each section follow through. Although, the addition of the titles to such sections (ex. heat balance calorimeter, power compensation, etc.) may need a more thorough addition of details. As needed as possible a bit more extended of a paragraph or a couple more sentences to add on more depth.

Content:

Well, filled out throughout the edit, and for addition of new paragraphs and topics to further the topic seemed well included with a well-balanced tone to provide the reader a better key understanding and ability to pay attention to the article and not get bored.

Sources and References:

As for source citations if there were any included, it was not possible to find and quick and easy citation for the evidence reference. May need to include if using evidence from specific citations.

Images and Media:

No images or media was included, although near the end of the article references to main spoken key terms were good key.

Overall:

Overall, this article definitely is well thought out and organized, while some little detailing can be made to add in a bit more class to the topic at hand. As well, as some images if possible or links to media sources to back it up.

classmatesGeneral info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)