User:Nana byun/subpage

What article are you evaluating?
Encyclopedia

Evaluating Content

 * Maybe because of the limited sources, most of the references are not up-to-date.
 * I would suggest the contributor to add more detail on the word experts in the introduction paragraph. In my class dicussion, I think it is important for us to figure out how expertise are defined in the genre and it would be better if the conttibutor can give more definition on that. (like scholars who are experienced in the field or being active in the professional ring etc.)
 * Also I suggest the contributor can summarize the content a little bit to make it easier for reader to grasp information. Such as the Four Major Element under the characteristic part, it would be perfect if each element can be summerize into words or phrases.

Evaluating Tone

 * The tone are neutral and comprehensive. It even prodive information about the biggest encyclopedias which is the Chinese website.
 * I am not sure whether a controversy part can also be included in the description of encyclopedia, but what I have seen so far is that this website provide only neutral and positive description about encyclopedia, I wonder maybe information about the negative aspect of encyclopedia can also included in the list (if it can be found)?

Evaluating Sources

 * The citation links work and perfectly support the information list in the website.
 * Also the sources comes from diverse array, some are individual scholars, some are scholarly book and articles.
 * One part need to be improved was that the verification of sources in the part of "Largestest Encyclopedia" are not success, and other citation are need in the paragraph as well.

Checking the talk page

 * I see they had a conversation on whether they should included the break down the term to different detail like "online encyclopedia" and "encyclopedia". I see they put some effort in arrange the whole page to make it feasible and look resonable, which is the content we did not really get into in our class discussion.