User:Nanderson626/Rent party/HunterKaimi Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Nanderson626
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Nanderson626/Rent party

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes. The lead paragraph clearly and concisely explains what a Rent party is and its purpose.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, but could expand on them a bit more.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Almost. Musicians are mentioned by name and it seems to be that the musicians/bands present in the rent parties played a large role in the parties, but there is no further information on them or how they impacted the rent party scene.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Overall it is concise (maybe a bit too concise)

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes. All of the information sticks to the topic and subject matter.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * To my knowledge yes. The topic is from a hundred years ago so to my knowledge, yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I think content about the music present in the rent parties would add to the topic, giving it more of a cultural background. Also information about the rent prices would be helpful.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes. Only part that sways is the mention of "hardships" and "everyday struggle".
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * None that are heavily biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * Maybe the content about the hardships and struggle, but that is a topic that is somewhat difficult to not persuade a little bit. But with some rewording I think it can be a very solid paragraph.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * To my knowledge, yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * As current as they can be for a 100 year old topic.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, enjoyable and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not upon first glance.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, although more sup points about music and cost of living would be helpful.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes/
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, doubled original content and provided a better history of the topic.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * More sources, better history, better analysis, more detail about the rent parties.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * More content, further in depth about rent cost and history.