User:Nanderson626/Rent party/TreyonReche Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Nanderson626)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Rent party

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead adds a quite a bit to the understanding of the content of the article. The introductory sentence is clear and concisely demonstrates to me what the article is going to be about. The lead does include hints of content to follow in later sections. However, the lead does have a bit more details about the background of Rent Parties, in regards to Jazz and piano performances, than the history section. All the same, the difference in information provided is minimal. The lead is concise and not overly detailed.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
The content added added to the article stays relevant to the topic. It would be nice to see some more recent history of Rent Parties added to the history section. There are no content that is included that does not belong, and as far as my assessment there is not anything significant missing from the article.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The content provided is neutral, with no notable claims that show signs of heavy bias. As a natural extension, no viewpoints were overrepresented or underrepresented, and the content did not have a persuasive tone.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The content is backed by reliable sources. The sources are relevant, current, and operational.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content is pretty well written. I did not notice any grammatical or spelling errors either. As for sections, I believe that everything fit in a appropriate section.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
No images were included, however, I would of liked to see a picture of what a rent party looked like.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
I am not currently certain if this article is new, all the same I did find an appropriate amount of well informed relevant sources, infoboxes, section headings fitting to most comparisons.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The content of the article I read was on track to making a well done Wikipedia page. They started a good attempt to provide accurate and extensive information on the topic they chose (House Party). I would like to see an additional section that the House party page had, in detail the section about historical parties in history. On top of that with an added picture of what rent parties would look like, I would find this article satisfactory.