User:Nansks/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I will be evaluating an introductory article about Clinical physiology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I found it interesting and relevant to my field of interest which is medicine. Also, I knew fairly little about the field of clinical psychology before and this article provides a brief overview of the field.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section :

The introduction provides a brief definition of clinical physiology, which is easy to understand and follow. Although, later in the section the author does go into more detail but does not introduce the other sections that will be in the article.

Content :

The content of the article is coherent and does go into detail to explain the role and function of clinical physiology. All the sections of the article (History and role) are relevant to each other and provides consistent information. The information in the history section could be more detailed, it only provides a brief overview of the history of clinical physiology in different countries. The difference between regular physiologists and clinical physiologists can also be explained in more detailed.

Tone and Balance :

The tone of the article is neutral but it focuses more on the history of certain countries than others. The author does not overrepresents the importance of clinical physiology.

Source and References :

Some of the sources are not up to date. There is also information in the article that has not been cited. Most of the sources only give a brief overview of the topic. Only the key information is cited.

Organizing and writing quality

The article is well organized based on the amount and content of the information.

Image and Media

There are no images or any other form of media in the article.

Talk Page discussion

The discussions in the talk page is mainly about the article and how it can be proved, which includes more detailing and more sections to add more information.

Overall Impression

The article is underdeveloped and needs more details like deeper history that focuses is globally focused. The references of the articles should also be updated.