User:Naomistow31/Extraterrestrial life/LynSchwendy Peer Review

General info
Naomistow31
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Naomistow31/Extraterrestrial life
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Extraterrestrial_life&oldid=1219432951

Evaluate the drafted changes
The addition to the lead does a good job of introducing the idea that you added later on, and the introductory sentence introduced the article topic well overall. Though the lead does seem to outline the major sections, I think it may benefit from being reordered to better match how these sections are ordered in the article itself. It also appears that some of the historical information included in the lead is not in the rest of the article, but the sections you edited look good. Again, aside from the historical section of the lead, it seems to be the right balance of informative and concise.

The content you added fits well into the topic and adds additional context in a way that greatly improves the article. The content you added appears up to date and the section feels complete and without any extraneous elements. It’s very concise and informative!

You did a great job keeping your tone neutral and including multiple viewpoints with the amount of weight they needed. The information was also presented in a clear, informative way that didn’t appear to be any sort of attempt to persuade the readers. I also didn’t notice any grammatical errors and the section was easy to follow and well organized.

The sources seem solid overall, but it looks like there might be some issues with missing journal information in some of them.

Great job overall! The content you added definitely made the article more informative. It was well organized, and the tone was perfect. The only improvement I would suggest is maybe looking into the citation issue I mentioned above!