User:Narellano21/Draculin/CRM2000 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Narellano21)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draculin - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Draculin - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

All the content that the user added is up to date and relevant. Yes, the content added is well written, it is also concise and easy to read. There are no noticeable spelling or grammatical errors. The content is not broken down into sections though it is all in one big paragraph. All of the links that were included in this article did lead to other Wikipedia articles or other sources. The sources are also current and were written by multiple authors. None of the article is biased or pointed towards a specific argument the whole thing is very neutral. The content can be added to improve the article by adding more to the article including separating it into different sections.