User:Nariyah B./Isognomon perna/Hooter18 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Hooter18)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nariyah%20B./Isognomon_perna?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article
 * Isognomon perna

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) * yes the information because I learned new things.
 * 4) * Yes, I agree as well. It is important and interesting to learn new information about each unique species.
 * 5) Check the main points of the article:
 * 6) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 7) * yes
 * 8) * I agree that my article only discusses the Isognomon Perna.
 * 9) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 10) * yes
 * 11) * I agree that all of my subtitles for each section is appropriate.
 * 12) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 13) * Its appropriate
 * 14) * I do not think anything has to be moved in my article.
 * 15) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 16) * yes
 * 17) * Why and how can my article be considered appropriate for a worldwide audience?
 * 18) Check the sources:
 * 19) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 20) * yes
 * 21) * I agree that each of my statements or sentences have at least one source and link with a little number.
 * 22) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 23) * yes
 * 24) * I agree that the bottom of my article has a reference page.
 * 25) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 26) * yes
 * 27) * I agree that each of my sources are provided with a little number.
 * 28) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 29) * its of good quality
 * 30) * I think my article is a good quality, but why is my article considered a good quality?
 * 31) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 32) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 33) * nothing because its really good
 * 34) * Thank you for your feedback on my article and I think nothing needs to be changed or anything.
 * 35) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 36) * yes it is
 * 37) * I agree that my article is ready for prime- time.
 * 38) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?Nothing because I think everything is good and it has enough info.
 * 39) I agree as well that my article has enough information, along with sources and references.
 * 40) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?no because it is similar to mine.
 * 41) How is my article similar to yours? Structure? Information? Etc?