User:Naro13/English-language learner/Kieramalley Peer Review

General info
- Naro13
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * - User:Naro13/English-language learner:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead

 * Seemingly, there is no lead in this draft. There is a heading for such, but no subtext. The draft dives right into data about ELL's with disabilities. Although a fascinating and important topic, the draft should start by defining what ELL means and offer specific classroom contexts.

Content

 * Content is relevant to educators specifically. If you wanted this topic to be more broad, you may simplify the article so that is discusses less examples of classroom / educational application and more generalized information about English Language Learners and their role / placement in and out of traditional K-12 context. However, the information added is up to date as recently as 2023, giving it validity. The added details about content relevancy to ELL's impacting test data is useful information for classroom application.

Tone and Balance

 * Content is neutral and flows with the original text well. I think more context is needed on WIDA, the enrollment of ELL children, and the impacts of special education services / lack thereof impact data. Because of the brevity of the article, it is difficult to assess balance.

Sources and References

 * There is only one reference, however there are two footnotes beneath it, which makes it unclear exactly how many references are being utilized. More references will be needed to develop a longer, more thorough article on the topic. However, the reference is very recent, from 2023. The link in the second footnote is unavailable.

Organization

 * The content is easy to read, but as previously stated, it is not long enough. It definitely needs to be broken into sections such as a Lead (defining the topic), school applications, disabilities / special services, etc.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * N/A

For New Articles Only

 * Unsure if this is completely new - but will certainly require more sources and headings to meet notability requirements. It has potential to build upon!

Overall impressions

 * Overall, the information provided is clear, concise, and relevant. There is just not a lot of information in the draft yet. With where I think this is headed, this would make a great resource for ELL teachers / bilingual districts. However, to my understanding, we are trying to avoid making a draft that is catered to teachers. Either way, I look forward to seeing how this develops.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)