User:Narsez/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_Presidential_Library_and_Museum
 * J'ai choisi cet article car il s'agit d'une ébauche d'un établissement intéressant. Son double rôle est un aspect qui a des ramifications intéressantes.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Oui
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Non
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Non
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? il n'y a que l'en-tête.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Oui
 * Is the content up-to-date? Oui
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Oui
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? NoN

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Oui
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Non
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Non
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Non

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Non
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Non
 * Are the sources current? Oui
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Non
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Oui

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Oui
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Non
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Non

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Oui
 * Are images well-captioned? Oui
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Oui
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Oui

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?               Il n'y a pas de conversations.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?                   Une demie-étoile. Il fait partie des projets Boston, États-Unis et Sciences de l'information et des bibliothèques.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Il est une ébauche
 * What are the article's strengths? Il possède une en-tête très détaillée et contient les informations de base nécessaires pour identifier l'établissement.
 * How can the article be improved? Il peut être amélioré en offrant des informations de profondeur sur le travail de l'établissement et l'architecture celui-ci.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Il est sous-développé, puisqu'il manque des informations, mais il représente une bonne fondation.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: