User:Narzse/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Witness protection)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is unique and something I am somewhat interested in. I picked this article because it is related to legal studies.

My preliminary impression of the article is that it was well written and very informative. It included a multitude of countries witness protection programs and what they entail.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Content

everything in the article is relevant to the topic. Nothing is out of date because the article has been updated constantly with the most recent update being the 24th of September 2023. There is no impartial gaps within the article. something that could be improved upon is there are hyper links that have a page that doesn't exist.

Tone

really neutral tone with no bias at all within the article. There are some points that have more information than others but it is still informative.

Sources.

All of the links work within the article, and it does support the claims of the article. The sources have a neutral tone. The sources are diverse coming from different countries and very neutral about the topic.