User:Nash Albrecht/Electric vehicle/Rarredondo7 Peer Review

Context
Per the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety(IIHS), there is growing proof that electric vehicles are at least as safe as conventional vehicles. Several 2021 electric vehicles have earned the Top Safety Pick+ designation given by the IIHS. These vehicles include the 2021 Volvo XC220 Recharge, and the Tesla Model 3. Also the Ford Mustang Mach E earned the lower tier award, Top Safety Pick. “The 2021 TOP SAFETY PICK award requires good ratings in all six IIHS crashworthiness tests — driver- and passenger-side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraints. Winners must also be available with good or acceptable headlights and a front crash prevention system that earns advanced or superior ratings in both the vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-pedestrian evaluations. To qualify for the “plus,” vehicles must come with good or acceptable headlights across all trim levels and packages.” -

Neutral Content


 * Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." Yes when they state “ electric vehicles are at least as safe as conventional vehicles “
 * Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say...". They claimed that the IIHS claims that electric vehicles are at least as safe as conventional vehicles.
 * Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. The clear reflection of this information is that Electric vehicles are claimed to be as safe as conventional cars and if not better, but throwing Ford Mustang Mach E under the bus and showing that a conventional car had the worst rating to throw a plug that the worst car is not a electric car.

Reliable Sources
Good articles are built on good sources. When you've read the article, turn to the references section.


 * The only thing I have to say is that the sources are good but you know how Galvan is that's not enough to say and he would prob suggest using more sources for your information