User:NatalieJHammons/Bubonic plague/Skoodles Peer Review

General info
NatalieJHammons
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
''Is everything in the article related to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''

Yes, I would say everything in the article is related to the topic. A lot of very interesting information. I wouldn’t say that anything distracted from the topic.

Is the article neutral?

I would say that the article is neutral. Since it’s talking about a disease, I believe it would be difficult to lean towards a particular side since there really aren’t any.

''Do the citation links work? Does the source support the claim being made in the article?''

The links that I checked work and I believe that the sources definitely support the claims in the article.

''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''

Yes, every fact has a source and the sources are neutral.

Additional notes

This article is full of interesting information, and it’s formatted quite well. The images and media included really adds to the article and are in good places in the article.