User:Nataliejgomez/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rent regulation in New York

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it relates to this course. Rent regulation is very connected to the housing market and Urban housing issues. I also chose it because it looked interesting to read.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Evaluating Content:

The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead section includes a brief description of the article's major sections. The lead section is concise. The article's content is relevant to the topic. The content is up-to-date. It was last edited in December 2023. There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong.

The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations. This article lists the rent regulation from a statutory perspective and doesn't list the impact of legislation on people. It should add the history of groups of people being affected by the rent crisis.

Evaluating Tone:

The tone of the article is neutral. It could be claimed there is bias from statutory perspective. There is no human aspect to this.

Evaluating sources:

The links work. The sources support the claims in the article. Each fact is seemingly referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. The information comes from peer reviewed articles and Federal and State Acts. These are mostly neutral sources. I don't notice any bias. The sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications.