User:Nataliejgomez/Zoning in the United States/Claudiabudzyn Peer Review

General info
(Nataliejgonez)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Nataliejgomez/Zoning in the United States/Bibliography
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Zoning in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Natalie has made significant improvements to the "Zoning in the United States" article by suggesting additions to both the exclusionary section and the health and environmental section.


 * 1) Exclusionary Section Enhancements:
 * 2) * Landmark Cases Related to Euclidean Zoning: This addition will provide readers with a deeper understanding of the legal framework surrounding zoning regulations. By incorporating landmark cases, readers can grasp the historical context and legal interpretations that have shaped zoning policies over time.
 * 3) * Inclusion of Specific Case Studies: Introducing case studies that exemplify the impact of Euclidean zoning on various communities will enhance the article's relevance and practicality. Real-world examples offer concrete illustrations of the effects of zoning regulations, allowing readers to comprehend the complexities and consequences involved.
 * 4) Health and Environmental Section Enhancements:
 * 5) * Integration of Case Studies: By integrating case studies, the article can illustrate the real-world implications of zoning decisions on environmental outcomes and public health. These examples will provide tangible evidence of how zoning policies directly affect communities and the environment.
 * 6) * Investigation into Long-Term Effects: Exploring the long-term effects of zoning decisions on environmental sustainability and public health adds depth to the discussion. By analyzing the lasting impacts of past zoning choices, readers can gain insights into the broader implications of such policies and their implications for future planning and development.

All in all, Natalie's proposed changes enrich the article by providing readers with more comprehensive insights into the legal, social, and environmental dimensions of zoning in the United States. These enhancements will enhance the article's educational value and its relevance to contemporary issues in urban planning and development.