User:NatashaEPronko/Costa Coffee/Alannanaseer Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing NatashaEPronko's work


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * NatashaEPronko/Costa Coffee
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Costa Coffee
 * Costa Coffee

Evaluate the drafted changes
The student who's work I am reviewing has yet to create a draft. The suggestions I have made are based on the current article.

LeadThe introductory sentient of the Lead is clear, concise, and relevant to the article's topic. Included in the Lead is a brief overview of the article's major sections. All information included in the lead can be found throughout the article.

Content

The content of the article is relevant to the topic and mostly up-to-date. The article does not health with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

The presentation of the content is neutral, unbiased, and favours no particular perspective. All perspectives presented in the article are represented equally.

Sources and References

The article lacks a good amount of peer-reviewed sources but the sources present are relevant. Some content requires further sourcing.

Overall Impressions

Overall, the article is well organized but lacks sufficient sourcing and needs revision. Some sentences should be re-evaluated and a wide variety of peer-reviewed sources are needed.