User:NatashaEPronko/Costa Coffee/Yvasy067 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing NatashaEPronko's work.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * NatashaEPronko/Costa Coffee
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Costa Coffee
 * Costa Coffee

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The student who's work I am reviewing hasn't create a draft yet but based on the current article I made notes of changes I suggest they conduct.

All the source links work properly, the sources support the article claims. If possible I would add a source link to the names of the founders, in case reader want to do further research on the Costa brothers for connivence and accessibility. I would also add a link to the hedge fund ‘Sachem Head’, ‘Twitter’, and ‘Costa Express’.

I would suggest they fix the sentence structure and layout of the last paragraph of the ‘history’ section as it is poorly phrased.

Under products I would list past products that Costa Coffee has carried in comparison to current products just so visitors of the page have context on the growth of the company.

Overall the base article itself is concise and well structured just lacking polish, there is evidence of lack of proof reading as sentence structure can be found questionable at times and lacking support behind certain claims.