User:Nate1256/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Pithecopus ayeaye
 * Article Evaluation
 * I chose this article because they are critically endangered and there is not a lot of information in the article.
 * The Lead does describe the articles topic. There are not any major sections, because it is just two paragraphs. The Lead has some information in it, but not that much.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. The content seems somewhat up to date. The latest source is from 2004. There is a lot of content that is missing. What it eats, any predators, lifespan, etc.
 * The article is neutral. It only states facts about the frog. There are not any viewpoints that are over or underrepresented. The article does not try to persuade readers to favor a position. There is not much information. The facts may be backed up by the one source that is listed in the article, however, there is only one in-text citation. The source does reflect the literature on the topic. The source is from 2004, but they may update it often. The top link does not work, but the bottom link does.
 * The article is poorly written. In the first paragraph, it introduces the frog, says where it lives, the habitats it lives in, how it lays its eggs, and what happens when they hatch, and habitat loss. The second paragraph talks about how there are not any specific conservation measures. I could not find any grammatical or spelling errors. The article is not well-organized. It is only two paragraphs. It does not include any sections.
 * The article does not include any images.
 * There is not any discussion about this topic. It is part of the WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles.
 * The overall status for this article is very poor. The one strength it has is that an article was actually created for the frog. The article can be improved immensely. Images, table of contents, and more information can be added to make the article better. The article's completeness is poorly developed. There is not much to read about this frog, but there soon will be.
 * The overall status for this article is very poor. The one strength it has is that an article was actually created for the frog. The article can be improved immensely. Images, table of contents, and more information can be added to make the article better. The article's completeness is poorly developed. There is not much to read about this frog, but there soon will be.


 * Sources
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources