User:Nateleboeuf/In My Father's Kitchen/ShaynaLakin Peer Review

General info
Natelebouef, Njputman
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Nateleboeuf/In My Father's Kitchen
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead is overall clear and easy to understand. The information is relevant for reading the rest of the article. The only thing I would add is a citation after the date the organization was established because as a reader, I don't know where that information is coming from.

Content: The content of the article is very thorough and well written. In the section Street Outreach, at the end of the first paragraph there's a number 2 in parentheses. I don't know if that's supposed to be a citation but I would definitely take a look at that and figure out why it's there. Other than that, citations are present throughout so that is good to see. Also the part that's quoted from the organization's homepage about their values: I would double check because I know usually Wikipedia does not want information to be quoted from another source so I would make sure you are allowed to include those as quotes rather than paraphrasing.

Tone and Balance: The content added seems to be neutral and without any opinions.

Sources and References: All reference links work and references are from a variety of different sources.

Images and Media: There are no pictures currently in the article. I would maybe add a photo of the organization or the founders, something to give people something visual.

Overall, this is a great start to the article. The information is clear and concise and the article is well-written.