User:Natfowler99/Anita Magsaysay-Ho/WLindaD Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * I am reviewing the work of Natfowler99
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Natfowler99/Anita Magsaysay-Ho

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content added.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The Lead does include an introductory sentence that clearly and concisely describe the article's topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The Lead does not appear to have a brief description of the article's section titled "Biography" but this should be fine since there's really no way to have a brief description of the information in that section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * The Lead does briefly mention that Magasaysay-Ho "specialized in Social Realism and post-Cubanism" but it is not mentioned elsewhere in the article directly (it's implied in the later sections).
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The Lead is rather concise.

Lead evaluation
The lead is pretty good overall. It does a decent job giving a brief overview of the article's topic although the information about Magasaysay-Ho specializing in Social Realism and post Cubanism is not mentioned directly in the article (could maybe fix it by directly stating it later and give a short explanation of what the term means).

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * The content added is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The content added appears to be up to date, non of the information appear to be out of date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There does not appear to be any content that does not belong, though there could maybe more information about her drawing career such as maybe describing some of her most famous works. Adding some pictures of Magasaysay-Ho's artwork and pictures of her may also be beneficial.

Content evaluation
The content of the article are all relevant to the topic. The newly added content are all relevant to Magasaysay-Ho and her artwork.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The content added is neutral and the tone is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * There does not appear to be any claims that are heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * All viewpoints appear to be equally represented.
 * There are no viewpoints that are criticizing Magasaysay-Ho, but after doing some search on my own, I was not able to find any source with information criticizing her.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * The article does not attempt to persuade the reader to favor a position over another.

Tone and balance evaluation
This article has a neutral tone and is balanced. It informs the readers about Anita Magasaysay-Ho without trying to persuade them to form certain opinions about her. There is a lack of information about criticisms of her but that information does not appear to be available from other sources.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * The sources backing the new content up appear to be reliable.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The sources are pretty through all together. Some of the sources are shorter than other sources, but they all do provide information on the topic to various degrees.
 * Are the sources current?
 * The sources are relatively current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The links on the reference work.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources all appear to be credible, reliable, and clickable. Most of the claims are also cited as well.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content is well written. It is concise, clear and easy to read
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * There does not appear to be any grammatical or spelling errors in the newly added content.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The newly added content are well organized into the older sections and into the new section "Works of Art".

Organization evaluation
The article is very well organized. However, for the second paragraph added into the "Biography" section, I would consider moving it to the Works of Art section since I feel it has more to do with her artwork then her general life.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * The article does not have any images yet.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * There are no images yet so there's no need for captions thus far
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * No images have been added yet.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No images have been added yet.

Images and media evaluation
No image has been added yet so there's really no evaluation of the quality of it. Adding some image of Magasaysay-Ho and her artwork may be beneficial.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.\

The article is not a new article so these questions are not applicable.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
It's not a new article so the questions are not really applicable. However, linking the article to more articles could be helpful.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The content added has made the article more complete although not much information was really added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The strengths of the added content were that they made the article more detailed and also elaborated on pre-existing information such as the information about Magasaysay-Ho's death. The new section "Works of Art" also gives the audience more general knowledge about Magasaysay-Ho's work of arts.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * The content could be further improved by mentioning some of her more well known artwork. The content could also be improved with maybe adding some pictures and maybe even a section about Magasaysay-Ho's legacy.

Overall evaluation
This article is really well written overall and the new content definitely improved the article. There was more information about the artworks of Magasaysay-Ho and I really liked how you broke the big clump of awards she's won into a list, making it a lot easier to read. The information is presented neutrally and I don't see signs of trying to persuade the audience to form certain ideas. I also like the Lead for the article very much and it has given me some insight into how I should the lead for my article. The article could be further improved by linking it to other Wikipedia articles and adding pictures (but I also haven't done those two things for my article either since I was going to save it for last).