User:Nathaly005/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Ancient Egyptian architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it was in class C and I find ancient Egyptians fascinating. This matters because it is taught in schools and people will search this up to learn more about it. I thought the article was pretty good but short so that might mean there is a lot of information that can still be added.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead sections needs some work. The first sentences does not tell me what the article will be about. The content is okay but could be better. The tone is definitely neutral and I don't see biases. The sources and references work and there is different authors. There is no grammar errors and the article is written clear on some parts. There is plenty of images that are well captioned. The talk page is not very active. There is conversation about the things the article needed work on and that there was vandalism on it. The article is rated a start-class article. The overall impression of this article is that its short and needs more information .The strengths are the images and it can be improved by introducing the article more in the first two paragraphs. The article is underdeveloped. ~