User:Nathan Yu 2023/Yuantouzhu/Emmaemmay Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nathan Yu 2023


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nathan Yu 2023/Yuantouzhu
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Yuantouzhu

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead has been added with two sentences and has provided a brief introduction of the topic. The added sentences are quite clear and concise.

The content is relevant and up-to-date, with information of major spots, opening hours, tickets price and local delicacies. I don't see any missing content. I don't think it deals with Wikipedia's equity gaps.

The whole article is written with a neutral tone, no biased statement or persuasion appeared.

All of the sources seem reliable. The sources are thorough and relatively current. The links all work well.

The overall content is well-organized and no obvious grammar mistakes.

The images added give readers a first impression of the major spots, and they are well-captioned and appealing.

In summary, the content has been improved a lot, good job!