User:NathanielB2020/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Digital journalism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I have chosen to evaluate this article because it relates to the realm of technology. And as a 2000's baby I feel as if this is very relatable to me and the news media I get. I tend to watch the news a lot nowadays, and this source interest me. Also, people tend to say that you shouldn't trust everything you see online and I feel this article can reflect and offer a perspective.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section:

- The lead begins with a concise definition of digital journalism, highlighting it as a contemporary form of journalism distributed via the internet.

- It provides a brief overview of what digital journalism encompasses, including its distribution forms and formats.

- There doesn't appear to be any information in the lead section that isn't present in the article.

- The lead is succinct and effectively introduces the topic without being overly detailed.

Content:

- The content of the article is relevant to the topic of digital journalism and covers various aspects such as its definition, history, impact on readers and publishers, implications on traditional journalism, and the rise of citizen journalism.

- The article seems up-to-date, referencing a Pew survey from 2019.

- There doesn't appear to be any major missing content, but some sections could be expanded upon for a more comprehensive understanding, such as discussing specific examples of digital journalism platforms or case studies.

- The article addresses the issue of equity gaps by discussing how digital journalism has impacted traditional journalism practices and the rise of citizen journalism, which allows individuals without formal journalism backgrounds to contribute to news reporting.

Tone and Balance:

- The article maintains a neutral tone overall, presenting various perspectives on digital journalism without heavily favoring one over the other.

- There are no apparent claims that appear heavily biased towards a particular position.

- Viewpoints seem to be represented fairly, although there could be more exploration of potential criticisms or drawbacks of digital journalism.

- Minority or fringe viewpoints are not prominently featured, but the article acknowledges the diversity of perspectives within the field.

Sources and References:

- Most facts in the article are backed up by sources, although some claims could benefit from more citations.

- The sources seem thorough and reflect a wide range of literature on digital journalism.

- While the article references historical events and developments, it could include more recent sources to ensure its currency.

- There doesn't appear to be a diversity issue with the authors of the sources cited, but it's unclear whether historically marginalized individuals are included.

Organization and Writing Quality:

- The article is generally well-written, with clear and concise language that is easy to read.

- There are a few minor grammatical errors and instances where citations could be clearer.

- The article is well-organized into sections that reflect the major aspects of digital journalism, such as its definition, history, impact, and implications.

- Images and media:

- There are no images in the article, which could enhance understanding, especially in sections discussing digital media formats or platforms.

- The absence of images adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations, but visual aids could improve the article's appeal and accessibility.

Talk page discussion:

- Talk page offers a brief overview on what the article is and encourages engagement from other authors to enhance the articles strength.

Overall impressions:

- The article provides a comprehensive overview of digital journalism, covering its definition, history, impact, and implications.

- Strengths include its clear organization, relevant content, and neutrality.

- To improve, the article could benefit from more recent sources, additional examples or case studies, inclusion of images, and engagement with other Wikipedia editors through the talk page or WikiProjects.

- The article appears to be well-developed but could be further enhanced with updates and additional content to reflect ongoing changes in digital journalism.