User:Nathanrice14/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
2018 Masters Tournament - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am a huge golf fan, my favorite tournament is the masters, along with Augusta national being my favorite golf course. This was also labeled as a c-class article.

Evaluate the article

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? No, there are many different points of other golf tournaments mentioned, and other winners not pertaining to the masters 2018. Is there anything that distracted you? yes
 * Is any information out of date? no Is anything missing that could be added? tiger woods
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? yes Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations? no they actually do a good job of talking about the history
 * What else could be improved? easier to follow.
 * Is the article neutral? yes Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? tiger woods
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? yes Does the source support the claims in the article? yes
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? yes Where does the information come from? other sites, scoreboards Are these neutral sources?yes If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications? all golf articles
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? there are none
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? there are none