User:Natilo/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Daisy Miller

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I went through the C-class articles, and I decided to look at this novella because I read it a few years ago.

Evaluate the article
While the lead, plot summary, and character list look fine - they are clear and organized well - the Talk section highlights some potential issues, mostly about biased claims about the book and not balancing the criticism the novel received. Additionally, the link under Note 6 leads to a nonexistent page. One thing I'm confused about is why Edith Wharton's short story "Roman Fever" is listed under the "See also" section. I suppose both stories have roman fever/malaria in them and they both reference the Colosseum, but neither article explains how they are connected, let alone what source claims that the two are connected. Additionally, one of the claims under "Critical evaluation" is being challenged for having an unknown source and what I assume to be vague language (it does not specify which critics are praising the novella).