User:Nativeteacher/Christians for Socialism/IllusiveAttic11 Peer Review

General info
Nativeteacher
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nativeteacher/Christians_for_Socialism?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Christians for Socialism

Evaluate the drafted changes
Introduction - Introduction section is unchanged in sandbox draft. I think that this section could have a bit more added to it regarding what the article covers. Just a few sentences that give a brief overview of the overall content of the article.

Founding - Founding section is sufficient and unchanged. I don't know what you would add if you had to add something to this section so it is fine.

Project - Unchanged

Antecedents - Unchanged. I think that this section could use more content in general. It really only mentions one group that came before the CPS. If that is the only case, and that the Iglesia Joven movement was the only precursor, then I believe that this subsections can just be tacked on to another section, instead of having its own unique heading.

Leaders - Unchanged. Maybe a sentence or two can be added stating why the CPS supported Castro, or what kind of social programs they tried to push.

Gatherings - The restructuring of the article works very well. It makes much more sense to describe the gatherings and conferences the the CPS were apart of before describing their oppression and suppression.

Critiques - The reordering of this section also works very well. Similarly to the previous section, this makes more sense to place here than it does to place it after the suppression or gatherings section in the current article.

Suppression and Oppression - The restructuring and addition of this section is well placed. The way the article is currently, the "suppression" section covers all forms of suppression and the disbanding of the CPS. With the way you've restructured this section, and added the disbanding section, it makes the article clearer to the reader and allows the body paragraphs to stay more on topic regarding the title of the subsections.

Disbanding - This section is good and stays on topic. The only thing that I would add would be a brief section, or a link to the article if there is one, about what the Pinochet regime is.

The article is very well written. The reordering of subsections make the article more clear in nature and allows the body paragraphs to stay on topic. I would add more to the intro paragraph but that is really.