User:Natixd123/National Association of Television Program Executives

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: National Association of Television Program Executives
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. - I have chosen to evaluate this article as it is lacking information about the founder and co-founder of the association. The article could also use some more information, referencing the official site: natpe.com

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, there is an introductory sentence that is clear but could be more concise.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, there are no brief descriptions of the article's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It neither concise or overly detailed. I find it to be lacking detail.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, it is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content up-to-date? No, it could use information about the co-founder, who was the president of the association and recently died.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes, there is missing content about founders of the association, the association's history, etc.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, the article is neutral as it does not contain any biases.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are no biased claims.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, the article does not contain views
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the article does not show an attempt at implying any methods of persuasion in favor of a certain position/perspective.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, but there are only two references. Therefore, more references should be added to make the article more informative and credible.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources are not that thorough as it is lacking enough references to make this article informative and reliable enough.
 * Are the sources current? Apart from the current external links listed, the latest reference is from 2011.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all of the links work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It could be more concise, needs improvement.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes, there are some punctuation errors.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No, it could be improved.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Only one of the logo.
 * Are images well-captioned? No, there are no captions.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No, as there should be a caption under the image.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, the image is placed appropriately in the article.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Three critical comments on the article, which point out grammatical/punctuation errors and point out that the article is lacking information.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is not rated. It is currently only part of my WikiProject.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We have not discussed it, but it relates to the class as it discusses an association that has to do with television and emerging media executives.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Average, needs citations, more references, could build on the topic and thus, can be improved.
 * What are the article's strengths? The introduction is clear and easy to read.
 * How can the article be improved? It could be improved by adding more information from reliable sources and including more content sections, images as well as developing various sections, including the history section of the article.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I would consider it as underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — Is it difficult to find reliable references for this topic?


 * Link to feedback: