User:Natpollock/Integration host factor/EdgarCorrale0619 Peer Review

Lead

 * The article has headings that make it every easy to find the information that you may be looking for.

Content

 * All of the content that is found through the article is very relevant about the phage. The article does a really good job at giving the reader the history of the Lambda Phage, the phage's importance, and about all of the work that is being done on the phage. The article also has a section dedicated to listing all of the proteins that make up the phage and their known functions. The only thing that the article fails to mention is whether if those are all of the proteins that can be found in the phage or if those are the only proteins that we know what they do for the phage.

Tone and Balance

 * The article does a really good job at not being biased. The content that has been added to the page does not try to persuade anyone to have a particular opinion about Lambda Phages. All of the claims that have been made throughout the article are not biased towards a particular opining or side.

Sources and References

 * Most of the sources that have been cited for this article are good sources, however, there are some sources that when you click on them they take you to a company's website, that instantly brings the quality of the source to an "ok" source. There does not appear to be any "bad" sources that have been sites. The vast majority of the citations that have been made are peer reviewed articles. I would recommend finding new citations for the sources that take you to a company's website. There are also some links that no longer seem to be working.

Organization

 * The article is every easy to read. The organization of the article is set up in a way where we learn the history of the phage first and then go into depth about the entire physiology of the phage. The wording of the article is every academic and there are no grammar mistakes.

Images and Media

 * All of the images that have been added to the article were carefully added. All of the images relate to a topic being discussed in the paragraphs. The captions underneath the images help describe what is occurring in the images.

Overall impressions

 * I really enjoyed reading this article. The article is every easy to read and very informative. It appears that all of the information that we can find about the virus was properly used in the article.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)