User:Natwill78/ASL interpreting/Bellis24 Peer Review

Lead:

I feel as if the lead does not need to change and is still encompassing of the original topic of ASL interpreting. My only input about the lead is that it mentions ASL interpreters requirements being challenging to achieve without the challenges or qualifications being thoroughly discussed in the topic.

Content:

The current additions you have made look really good and are much needed. Building off of these additions it might be beneficial to add a section discussing the educational requirements of interpreters, and common contexts an interpreter might be needed and how they can be hired.

Your overall content is very strong however, and I enjoyed learning about the different interpreting styles.

Tone and Balance:

The content gives is non-biased and strictly informational not giving attention to potential arguments or viewpoints, which is nice. I feel as is nothing is currently represented more than another subject and the writer has no preference on a type of interpreting style.

Organization:

This is a well organized WIKI and spacing out each section into small paragraphs makes them easy to read and digest. I might try to make the individual sections be indented but its a minimal change.

Sources:

I absolutely love the sources. I do not claim to be a wikipedia expert, but from my knowledge they look great!

Overall Impressions:

I really like the direction you are taking this article and believe you're making the much needed changes to make this a great article! With some additional information about interpreter education this will become a fantastic article. Keep up the good work!!!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)