User:Nautika.richards/Middle Ceramic Period (Kansas)/MagalyGS Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

3 positive comments: I like how you have done the citing with the numbers as we have learned, that is something I need to work on but you have done good in that! Your introduction paragraph was really informative and thought out. You have a nice solid outline and was impressive that you have your bibliography done.

3 areas of improvement/how: When it comes to bolding topics/headings make sure to keep it the same size or make it a little more distinct than the minor headings within those big bolded headings. When you go into the sites, be sure to describe the area as much as you can so the reader knows what the area is like. Lastly, it would be cool if you can insert a picture in your page to get a feeling of what the area looks like!