User:Nbrasch/Milwaukee Art Museum/Jphansen34 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

nbrasch


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nbrasch/Milwaukee Art Museum


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Milwaukee Art Museum

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

- Initial article was poorly organized

- Lacked sources that weren't from the institution itself

- I enjoyed the additional info about the governance as well as visiting info

- One thing that could be improved was about the collections or popular sections

- maybe info about big exhibits in the past?