User:Nbullis2018/Binge eating/SlayerWill Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Nbullis2018)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Binge eating, User:Nbullis2018/Binge eating

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes it does
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it talks about what it is and how it affects the body
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? It just gos into new sections directly after this so I guess not
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No the lead is clear and concise to the paper
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think it has a perfect amount of information because its not to long and its really to the point

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it all is linked towards the topic
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes it was written yesterday
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No I think its all important and concise

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes theirs links to support all of this
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yeah I think their all important to the article, everything thats listed seems like its supposed to be their
 * Are the sources current? yes their only a few years old
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yeah they all work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yeah its super simple to read, theirs no issues with any of it.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Maybe a few mis spelled medical terms but I think their all spelled correctly
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yeah the sections are organized good and you can clearly see where a new section starts from the old one

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Theirs actually no pictures so maybe they could add some
 * Are images well-captioned? their are none
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes because their are none
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Their are no pictures

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I think so, its on a huge disorder so I feel like any information added as long as its important and factual is important to the topic
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It helps to make the article better well rounded
 * How can the content added be improved? go over some of the spelling but thats about it