User:Nby2216/Canine influenza/Ngo0014 Peer Review

General info
Nby2216
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nby2216/Canine influenza
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Canine influenza

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * Yes, the lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer. The lead now mentions the two strains of canine influenza, A(H3N2) and A(H3N8).
 * The lead does not contain a clear lead or introductory sentence that concisely describes the article's topic. It delves directly into the topic without providing a brief overview.
 * The lead section does include information not present in the article's major sections, such as the mention of canine influenza being harmless to humans as a stand-alone virus and the possibility of it combining with a human strain of flu.
 * The lead section appears to be detailed and informative, but it is not concise.
 * The lead section does not provide a brief overview of the major sections such as the history of the virus and where and when it started.
 * To improve the lead, it would be beneficial to include a concise introductory sentence that clearly outlines the article's topic and major sections. Additionally, the lead could be made more concise by focusing on providing a brief overview of the topic, leaving the detailed information for the body of the article.

Content:


 * The content added is relevant to the topic of canine influenza (dog flu). It provides information about the history, transmission, symptoms, and vaccines related to canine influenza, which are all important aspects of understanding the disease.
 * The content appears to be up-to-date, as it references sources with recent publication dates, such as the CDC and the American Kennel Club.
 * There doesn't appear to be content that does not belong in the context of discussing canine influenza. The added content focuses on key aspects of the topic.
 * The article does not appear to address Wikipedia's equity gaps or topics related to historically underrepresented populations. It primarily provides factual information about canine influenza and its impact on dogs and cats. To address equity gaps, the article would need to include information relevant to how the canine influenza influenced the underrepresented population.

Tone and balance:


 * The content added by your peer appears to be neutral and fact-based. It provides information about canine influenza without showing any signs of bias or attempting to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. The content presents facts about the history, transmission, symptoms, and vaccines related to canine influenza without taking a particular viewpoint or stance. There are no indications of overrepresentation or underrepresentation of viewpoints in the provided content.

Sources and references:


 * The content is backed up by reliable sources such as the Emerging infectious Diseases Journal from the CDC, the American Veterinary Medical Association, and the American Kennel Club. The CDC is a reputable source for information related to public health. It is likely to provide accurate and up-to-date information on canine influenza. In addition, the Infection Diseases Journal is highly reliable with a large list of credible authors. The other sources are relevant to the topic and likely provides credible information, given the organization's focus on veterinary medicine.
 * Moreover, these sources primarily focus on veterinary and public health topics related to dogs and canine influenza.

Organization:


 * The content added appears to be reasonably well-written. It is concise, clear, and generally easy to read. It presents information in a straightforward manner, which is suitable for an informative article.
 * There don't appear to be any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The content is well-organized into sections that reflect the major points of the topic, including history, transmission, symptoms, and vaccines. This organization helps readers navigate the article and find information on specific aspects of canine influenza easily.
 * Overall, the content is structured and presented in a way that is conducive to understanding the topic.

Images and media:


 * The image provided is the influenza virus instead of the canine influenza virus
 * The image is well captioned and adheres to the Wikipedia's copyright regulations with a CC BY-SA

Overall impression:


 * The content added has improved the overall quality of the article by providing valuable information about canine influenza, including its history, transmission, symptoms, and vaccines. The added content makes the article more complete and informative on the topic of canine influenza.


 * The content is clear and understandable. It added more sections to cover key aspects of canine influenza, giving readers a well-rounded understanding of the topic. Furthermore, the content includes citations to reputable sources, adding credibility to the information presented.
 * In order to improve, additional content can be added to provide more in depth details from the topics by providing statistics or examples. More images and diagrams can be added such as transmission pathways. Lastly, the citation style should be consistent throughout the article.