User:Nby2216/Canine influenza/Skoodles Peer Review

General info
Nby2216
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
''Is everything in the article relevant to the topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''

I would say that every pathing in the article is relevant. Nothing in particular distracted me.

''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear to be heavily biased towards a particular position?''

Since this is a medical article, I would say it’s hard for it to be biased. The article does appear to be neutral.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or under represented?

No, I do not believe this article has any views that are overrepresented or underrepresented.

''Do the source links work? Does the source support the claims of the article?''

Yes, the links work and I believe that the sources do support the article claims.

Additional notes

The additions being drafted really do improve the quality of the article. The information added about the history and the transmission are relevant and, in my opinion, very interesting. Keep up the great work!