User:Nchardy/Chromis atripectoralis/KuanLin24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nchardy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nchardy/Chromis atripectoralis


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chromis atripectoralis

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

- Would be better to update the lead section with a brief description of of the article's major sections. But overall the lead is pretty good including some very useful information.

Content:

- Overall very detailed and provide sufficient information that are relevant to the topic.

- Linking scientific vocabulary to other wikipedia articles would be helpful.

- While it is good to include sister-species (C. viridis), we believe that it could get slightly confusing when it is mentioned too often.

- Should the last sentence under the 'Habitat' section be referenced? It seemed like it is a conclusion of some sort of data

Tone and balance:

- The tones are neutral.

- The topics are pretty well balanced with similar amount of information and length.

Sources and references:

- Most of the information added are backed up! Well done!

- Some of the source are quite old. (we don't know if that is really a major problem...)

Organisation:

- The content is pretty clear and easy to follow.

-Nicely separated by different sections

Overall:

We believe the article is pretty organised and easily understood. The different sections of the content tackle some of the major topics that will help people better understand the species.