User:Ne55rine10/Nancy Lancaster/Emyumontreal Peer Review

General info
Emyumontreal
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Nancy Lancaster
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
2. Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes, the Lead provides a clear and concise introduction to Nancy Lancaster, identifying her as a 20th-century tastemaker and the owner of Colefax & Fowler, known for the English country house look.

3. Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?The Lead does not mention any major sections within the article. It primarily provides an overview of Nancy Lancaster's significance.

4. Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

The Lead does not introduce any information not found within the article.

5. Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The Lead is concise, focusing on key points regarding Nancy Lancaster's significance and her association with Colefax & Fowler.

Content:

1. Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes, the content is relevant to the topic, providing biographical information about Nancy Lancaster, her marriages, and her significant role in interior decoration.


 * 1) Is the content added up-to-date?        The content covers Nancy Lancaster's life up to her death in 1994.

3. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

The content is comprehensive, covering different aspects of Nancy Lancaster's life and career.

4.Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

The article does not seem to focus on historically underrepresented populations or topics. It is primarily a biography of this individual.

Tone and Balance:

1. Is the content added neutral?

The provided text is neutral  and its presenting factual information about Nancy Lancaster's life.

2. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

There do not appear to be any claims that exhibit bias in the text.

3. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Given the biographical nature of the content, there is not  viewpoints. It primarily presents factual information about Nancy Lancaster's life.

4. Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

The content is informational and does not contain persuasive elements.

Sources and References:

1. Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

In fact this content references a book by Martin Wood and a quote from an obituary, which suggests some reliance on secondary sources.

3. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

The provided sources are mentioned but It's unclear if they cover the full scope of available information on Nancy Lancaster.

4. Are the sources current?

Some of the sources appear to be from recent years, such as 2005, 2007, and  from 1994.

Organization:

1. Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

The content is very clear and easy to read.

2. Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

The text is free of grammatical or spelling errors.

3. Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

The content is organized into sections, such as Biography, Personal life, Death, and References, which suggests a pretty much reasonable level of organization.

2. Are images well-captioned? Yes

4. Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles?

The text does follow a standard biographical format with sections like Biography, Personal life, and Death.

Overall impressions:

The content added appears to be a detailed and informative biography of Nancy Lancaster, focusing on her personal life and career.