User:Nealonc/Wendell Chino/MaeveMurrphy Peer Review

Everything that you added to the article was relevant to Wendall Chino. I think that you were very neutral in your article and I did not seem to see any bias in your claims. The links to the sources you used worked, but I am worried about the reliability of the sources. New York Times is a distinguished and credible newspaper and source of information, but sometimes they sway the opinions of the readers and are not completely unbiased. The other source you have is very outdated as it was published in 1998. I would try and find a 3-4 more journals or articles from google scholar or UCI's library database to stregthen your research and article. I think that their is a lot in your article that you can eleborate on. I think this will be a lot easier for you to accomplish once you compile more research. A good place to start is by going inot detail about the work he did for the Apache more then finding more sources to add relating to the work they did during their time as chairman in the National Congress of American Indians from the 1950-1990s. I also think the once sentence you have is a bit of a run-on sentence and could be workshopped so it is easier to understand. Overall, the article is lacking information and needs some more work and research before the final draft is submitted.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)