User:Necronater1/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1-Un-Dam the Klamath

 * Article Evaluation - Despite the subject matter being fairly political, the authors gave a neutral explanation of the movement. The article has not been updated in a year, and does not contain the updated news on the projected 2023 dam removal. The relicensing history section is quote heavy.
 * Article Evaluation - Despite the subject matter being fairly political, the authors gave a neutral explanation of the movement. The article has not been updated in a year, and does not contain the updated news on the projected 2023 dam removal. The relicensing history section is quote heavy.

Option 2-Klamath River Hydroelectric Project

 * Article Evaluation- The article could use a brief history section, detailing the early history of the project. Noticed that Copco #1, Copco #2, and Fall Creek Dam don't have dedicated articles, and therefore don't have links. Perhaps the Fall Creek Lake and Copco Lake article links could be included? The Dam Removal section is not up to date with the recent development.
 * Article Evaluation- The article could use a brief history section, detailing the early history of the project. Noticed that Copco #1, Copco #2, and Fall Creek Dam don't have dedicated articles, and therefore don't have links. Perhaps the Fall Creek Lake and Copco Lake article links could be included? The Dam Removal section is not up to date with the recent development.

Option 3-Copco Lake

 * Article Evaluation - Copco #1 has very limited info on it's subheading, but has a large summary section on the right, while Copco #2 has a longer subheading section but no summary section on the right. Both Copco's sections could be added to. The article could briefly mention the dam's projected removal in 2023.
 * Article Evaluation - Copco #1 has very limited info on it's subheading, but has a large summary section on the right, while Copco #2 has a longer subheading section but no summary section on the right. Both Copco's sections could be added to. The article could briefly mention the dam's projected removal in 2023.

Option 4-John C. Boyle Dam

 * Article Evaluation- If a source can be found, should mention its power generation. Should mention the John C. Boyle Reservoir and its use, similar to the Copco lake article. Dam removal info should be updated.
 * Article Evaluation- If a source can be found, should mention its power generation. Should mention the John C. Boyle Reservoir and its use, similar to the Copco lake article. Dam removal info should be updated.

Option 5-Iron Gate Dam


''' Article Evaluation- Article should mention the uses of the Iron Gate Reservoir since it has no dedicated article. Appreciate that it mentions it electricity output. Perhaps a more detailed history of its output would help show its history with the Klamath River.'''