User:Neejpadman/Phenotypic Response Surfaces/Lbucla88 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Neejpadman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Neejpadman/Phenotypic Response Surfaces
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

 * Includes introductory sentence with helpful links to unfamiliar background terminology
 * Defines phenotypic response surfaces concisely
 * Includes brief introduction of method and applications that are covered later in article

Content:

 * Relevant, updated content
 * History: Detailed, includes current applications of PRS
 * Methodology: Clear description of governing equation, helpful definitions of each variable are also included
 * Applications: Sub-sections help organize information well, has detailed statements in each subtopic along with supporting relevant studies

Tone/Balance:

 * Neutral tone, no bias
 * No persuasive attempt

Sources/References:

 * Relevant, updated
 * Cited evidence follows all new statements
 * All links work
 * Source #9: check date in References section

Organization:

 * Well-organized, sub-sections are easily understood and make logical sense
 * Great grammar, spelling, and sentence structure

New article:

 * Sufficiently supported by over 2-3 reliable secondary sources
 * Sources are varied and cover a broad range of PRS

Overall Impressions:

 * Great article, improved overall quality and completeness
 * I like the thought-provoking quote from Sir William Osler