User:Neelkoladiya/Ethics of cloning/Jcleophat Peer Review

Peer review

 * User:Neelkoladiya
 * Ethics of cloning

Lead evaluation
My peer did not update the lead to reflect new content but did look into other sections of the article. However, the lead does contain an introductory sentence that is concise and clear. It gives a very clear and informative summary of the major sections of the article.

Content evaluation
The content in this article is relevant to the ethics behind cloning and is up to date as it was last updated on September 20, 2019.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content in this article contains a neutral tone as it was more informative for the reader. The article is not heavily biased and represents a good amount of viewpoints.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources within this article contains more old sources than current courses. However, majority of these sources are reliable as they are more scientific articles. The sources do work.

Organization evaluation
The content was easy to read and understand. Though, I thought that there were a few (very little) grammatical errors that can be fixed. The article as a whole was well-organized and each section was very informative about the topic.

Images and media evaluation
There are no images or media in this article.