User:Nehal al-Shamy/Ibrahim Rauza/FaridaElsefary Peer Review

General info
Nehal Elshamy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Nehal al-Shamy/Ibrahim Rauza
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead is provides necessary background information on the article.

Content

The content is relevant, thorough, and presented well to the reader. It mostly relies on the presentation of information about the monument, without clearly or significantly addressing Wikipedia’s equity gaps, However, the author is keen to mention other contributing actors to the process of building the monument beyond Ibrahim Adel Shah II.

Tone and Balance

There is no apparent bias in this article, and there is also no critical tone. However, it is clear that the author is able to write well and can comfortably convey lots of information in the Wikipedia format. The author is also skilled at providing descriptive accounts of the monument, such that I, as a reader, feel as though I can paint an accurate picture of it in my mind.

Sources and References

The author uses a diverse range of reliable sources that are well cited. Embedded hyperlinks work, but more would be helpful as the article is packed with many names and terms.

Organization

The content is well-organized, concise and easy to understand which is further aided by the presence of multiple and clear subheadings.

Images and Media

There are no images, which makes it somewhat difficult to follow through the text as it is slightly lengthy and packed with information. Images would be useful page/paragraph breaks.

Overall Impressions

The article is an insightful resource for researchers. I enjoyed the account of the process of building the mausoleum, and Taj Sultana’s role in this history. Perhaps a brief discussion on the cultural/political significance of the monument would have been an interesting way to compliment the well-formulated description of its architectural and historical significance.