User:Nehal al-Shamy/Ibrahim Rauza/Moaazlafi Peer Review

General info
Nehal al-Shamy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Nehal al-Shamy/Ibrahim Rauza
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
The lead section is well-organized and engaging, enticing the reader to continue reading the article in full. It provides important and necessary information about the builder.

Content
The content is very good, as valuable and new information about the mosque has been added. Additionally, valuable elements about the workers and artists who contributed to this mosque have been included based on the inscriptions within it. Overall, I believe the content is comprehensive and well-defined, and it also avoids delving into subtopics.

Tone and Balance
The tone and balance are neutral and completely unbiased. I also believe it adheres to Wikipedia's article standards.

Sources and References
The Sources and References are good, and they are diverse. They include academic, which adhere to academic methodology, ensuring their impartiality and neutrality.

Organization
The organization is very good, and I believe it is based on Wikipedia standards.

Images and Media
I think the article lacks images and plans for the mosque.

Overall impressions
Overall, I had a positive impression of the article, as it provided me with new and valuable information.