User:Nekodesu2000/Eugenia Hanfmann/Tugrasi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Nekodesu2000)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Eugenia Hanfmann


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Eugenia Hanfmann

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

I think this is a good lead, I think you could move the last sentence into the first but otherwise this is a agood lead

Content:

Wow I am so impressed at the information you were able to find and the details on her life. I also like how you included some of the controversy at the end there as well as the rebuttal. I would be curious since there is so much about her work if there are people who continued some of her idea (students mentees).

I would suggest a couple more hyperlinks for things like philology

Sources:

Impressive source collection checked out the links and books. This definitely makes your page pretty impressive.

Tone and Balance;

Well balanced, ;you do a great job of sticking to the facts to describe what is happening.

Organization:

Very well written, sometimes instead of things like thesis problem, I would be more interested in what the thesis is.

Notability requirements are more than met, this well laid out and I understand her contributions and significance. Overall an incredibly strong article.