User:Nelson.bassett1/Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami/Padleyj Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Madison Goulding, AliSyed25, Nelson.bassett1
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami

Lead
The lead is very succinct. It clearly describes what the article is about and is very straight-to-the-point.

Content
Guiding questions:

The content in this article is thorough and relevant to the topic, it clearly describes all the aspects of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. It is mostly up-to-date, including information up until 2015. More recent information on events could be added but the article has good information on everything leading up to then.

Tone and Balance
The language used in this article is very neutral. The tone of the article is objective, there seems to be no bias towards any particular position.

Sources and References
Most of the content is backed up and provides good sources. There appears to be a good diversity among the literature on the topic. One suggestion could be that the "Goals" section could use some citations, otherwise it is very well sourced and referenced. It also appears that many of the links checked work!

Organization
Guiding questions:

The flow of the article is great - it is concise, clear and easy to read. The breakdown of the headings make the article very easy to read! I have not identified any spelling or grammatical mistakes in the article.

Images and Media
There is one image used in the Lead which gives the reader a visual to where this organization operates and what their logo is. It is well-captioned as it states what the photo represents. The images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations and are laid-out appropriately!

Overall impressions
Overall, the article is very well planned out and well-written. The tone is consistent and it is easy to read. I can't find many improvements to be made, great job overall!!