User:Nelson0226/Addictive behavior/GermanShepherdMom1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nelson0226


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Addictive behavior


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Addictive behavior

Evaluate the drafted changes
I will be reviewing the article itself because the sandbox does not have the article changes within it. The article is organized well, and has a good glossary to help the reader understand key terms from the article. I would add more information, maybe about the different types of addictions. These should be listed above the section titled " Compulsion vs addiction".

Look over the sources to see if they are relevant and within the 10 year time frame. I would also, make sure the references are from good academic sources, so the information provided is reliable. I clicked on the links and they all seem to work for me, so that is a good thing. You have a strong lead section that is clear and to the point of what the article will be talking about. It has lots of information as to what addictive behaviors are and the types of behaviors. It reflects the information that is considered important for this article. The lead may have more information than the article, so I would add the more information to the body of the article as suggested above.

The overall tone of your article seems neutral. I would double check for any grammar or spelling errors because I am not the best at spelling. I did not find any errors, but again I would double check. Make sure your heading titles are capitalized as they are important. ~