User:NeomiSepulveda/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Sustainable capitalism
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this article because I think as a society as a whole isn't quite ready to completely shift towards different economic systems. However, I think that younger generations are ready to shift so a baby step towards shifting away from capitalism is by way of sustainability. Sustainable capitalism is a great way of involving other generations and is an all hands on deck approach to taking better care of the planet.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Consise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes but doesn't really talk about solutions on how to get the a sustainable capitalist society
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes but the sources could be updates
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes, but they could be more current
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes and No
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The talk page consists of updates sources that could better apply to our society
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? In class we talked about examples on how to live sustainable in a capitalist society and we also talked about the externalities of our capitalist society today.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Its incomplete and concise
 * What are the article's strengths? The social aspects part of the article
 * How can the article be improved? The article could talk about examples or ways to transition to sustainable capitalism
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Underdeveloped

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: