User:Nesmailzadeh/sandbox

My name is Negin Esmailzadeh and I am a Junior taking Southeast Asian Archaeology!

= Article Evaluation (Week 2) = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskritisation
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything that was stated in this article was relevant to the topic being discussed.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * There are no biased standpoints in this article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Although it does not go into a deep history of Sanskritization it gives a brief overview with important highlights.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citations I clicked worked and they did pertain evidence to validate this article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The theory presented may come off bias depending on what sources they have been using.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Something I believe that could be added is the spread of Sanskritization and its impact and influence over certain regions of Asia.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * They are talking about cultural assimilation and how people are commending the author for putting it in the references.
 * Some arguing against the statement that it was a process of cultural assimilation.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article was rated Start Class in the quality scale and Mid-importance on the importance scale.
 * Yes it is part of a few WikiProjects India and Sociology
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We briefly discussed this in class but it was similar to what was presented in the article

= Week 3 = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracel_Islands?action=edit

Below I added a citation that was needed, to support the the statement I found the exact statement in a book.

== "After the communists gained control of China in 1949, they occupied Woody Island, the main island of the Amphitrite group and the only island that was occupied at the time. Pattle Island in the Crescent group, on the other hand, was taken by French Indochina and then controlled by South Vietnam following independence in 1956. Tensions over the islands have continued to rise unceasingly since then." ==

Week 4
In regards to the Cham article, I will hopefully like to plan more about the cultural lifestyles of the Cham people. There is only a vague description of their traditions and activities. In addition, I would hope to add more about the genocides and massacres that occurred during their invasion. I believe this article needs to highlight more of the characteristics and history of the Charm people and not focus on more present day.

Below are a few sources I would like to include :

= Week 5 = Outline for Indianization project:

Week 6/7: 1st Draft & Peer Review
Kalinga Ethnoarchaeological Project

To the talk box I added ideas they could include regarding the purpose and utilization of what was made, in addition to providing a source for a certain influential member of the movement.


 * Headings are clear as well as content
 * Not repetitive
 * Neutral content
 * Clear structure
 * Reliable sources
 * Very detailed and shows a lot of effort and research was put into its creation

= Week 8 = OPTIONAL