User:Neverquick

I've used Wikipedia for a few years, mostly for useless research projects or schoolwork and the like, but I also used to spend an unhealthy amount of time clicking Random Article. In fact, I'll do it right now...

Burly Bear Network, Ardisia maxonii, Thompson, Norfolk, Zhang Dan, Hipster PDA, Glacial Lake Wisconsin, Jacob Carruthers, Chicago Gaylords, 229, Kolonowskie.

OK, that helped sate the urge. Usually I only edit Wikpedia from scool, from bordom or because I can't stand to see a ward mispeld.

Thanks for the Barnstar 69.94.164.174!

Sandbox
User:Neverquick/Sandbox (Feel free to use it.)

Things I may have probably not most certainly done
I revert A LOT of vandalism. Seriously, look at my contribs, it's almost all RVV or warnings. Though I don't want to be an admin, I would be just to ban people after they get 5 final warnings. I think people with over 2000 edits should be able to ban people for an hour or two. It would really save me some trouble. Then again, if all the vandalism stopped, what would I do then? It's also the funnest thing to do here, to look at the vandalism. Its pretty funny sometimes. One thing I cannot stand is people blanking pages. I mean, if your gonna vandalize, at least make it entertaining. What do you accomplish if you just blanked a page? Engrossing. Now if you replaced page with X, that's a bit better, if unoriginal. Then again, maybe it's not a good idea to give vandals advice on how to improve their work.

You know what I love more than anything? What I call, "layer Vandals", who make vandalizing edits over and over again on the same page, and nobody finds them until half the page is covered in filth. If you really want to royally anger me, do that. It's made even worse when somebody actually makes a legitimate edit on top of the junk, without realizing that they've made the problem worse!