User:Newwriter007/History of tea in India/Allaboutarticles Peer Review

Peer review
Lead:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes, it has.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes, however, more effort could be put into it.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Not all of it, it doesn't introduce all the mentioned topics.


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

Not all the topics are mentioned in the lead.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

It's concise.

Content:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Only two of the six sources are up to date.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

No.


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Yes, it explains an underrated topic that not many people think or talk about.

Tone and Balance:


 * Is the content added neutral?

It is mostly informative, so no opinion is shown.


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No, it's descriptive, not controversial.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The Tea and Independence section can be researched a bit more.


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

The article is mainly dependent on the history of tea and how India's independence developed, not anything to persuade about it.

Sources and references:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes.


 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

yes, the Gandhi Heritage portal is a good source explaining India's independence and history and how tea has affected it.


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes, they do.


 * Are the sources current?

Not most, some of them are pretty old.


 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

Yes, and they include the history of a historically marginalized individual, Gandhi, a ruler and the importance of his involvement in the story of Indian tea.


 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

https://www.jstor.org/stable/27124696


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes, they work.

Organization:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

The writer has not added much yet to the article.


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No, it is error-free.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

It sums up the lead well.

Images and media:


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

There are no images in the article.

Overall impressions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Not a lot of content has been added for me to comment on the editing, however, the topic is a good choice since there is a lot of information however being an unaddressed and unknown topic.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)